Skip to content
Blockchain Certification

WSJ’s ShapeShift Exposé Overstated Cash Laundering by $6 Million, Examination Says


When it comes to cryptocurrency transactions, thoughts about alleged dollars-laundering speedily get thorny.

A Wall Avenue Journal investigation from final September, titled “How Filthy Cash Disappears Into the Black Gap of Cryptocurrency,” claimed the crypto conversion platform ShapeShift experienced facilitated at the very least $9 million value of money laundering more than many years with “a parade of suspected criminals.”

Now, at ShapeShift’s ask for, the blockchain certification analytics firm CipherBlade recreated the 2018 report and located a lot less than $3 million in transactions involving possibly “tainted” funds.

The main difference right here is that CipherBlade targeted on allegedly tainted cash alternatively of the overall price held in just about every affiliated wallet or account.

“Of the ShapeShift addresses which get ETH inside three hops from the preliminary soiled addresses, less than 50 % of the ETH traded by way of them are tainted,” the CipherBlade report says. “Using the most generous assumptions, this is nonetheless only 23.53 % of the WSJ’s claimed $9 million.”

Insert to that ether to approximately 40 bitcoin, which ShapeShift by itself discovered to be connected with suspicious wallet’s the WSJ recognized, and the whole estimate falls just shy of $3 million.

When questioned about the investigative process, a WSJ spokesperson instructed CoinDesk:

“An analysis looking at personal tainted ethereum coins, fairly than tainted wallets, would be a distinctive project than what the Journal embarked on, and one we simply cannot remark on mainly because we have not reviewed it.”

All get-togethers concur the most pessimistic studying of the info continue to implies questionable transactions built up a pittance of ShapeShift’s volume because the business was launched in 2014. In accordance to a tweet by CEO Erik Voorhees, ShapeShift processed crypto truly worth $30.3 million a month in 2017 alone.

Nevertheless, professionals such as Pawel Kuskowski, CEO of the analytics company Coinfirm, informed CoinDesk there’s no very clear response to how significantly may well have been laundered by way of the platform – for the reason that until October 2018 ShapeShift did not complete know-your-shopper (KYC) id checks.

“If you really do not know the underlying shoppers, how do you know?” Kuskowski instructed CoinDesk. “This is why you have KYC in the first put, to understand the profile.”

When requested about no matter whether it is far better to account for the total wallet or concentration on the tainted cash themselves, Kuskowski claimed the truth hides in the shades of gray in involving. He explained a elaborate analysis of the hazards connected with the men and women concerned in these transactions, alongside with “plausibility and some other policies,” all incorporate to reveal no matter whether the wallets by themselves need to be deemed tainted or suspicious.

In Coinfirm’s very own report on challenges connected with crypto platforms, ShapeShift was categorized as “high risk” with regards to anti-money laundering procedures and compliance because of anonymous use until eventually the KYC policy commenced previous October. According to Kuskowski, it frequently usually takes months for a traditional financial institution to de-danger soon after any association with income laundering.

“It’s a good course, that is for confident,” Kuskowski mentioned of ShapeShift’s added KYC procedures.

Compliance overhaul

That de-jeopardizing approach essentially began months before the WSJ report, in accordance to ShapeShift Chief Legal Officer Veronica McGregor.

“Among legislation enforcement, ShapeShift is regarded as a pretty practical and cooperative participant,” she instructed CoinDesk. “Just since we begun utilizing all those KYC treatments does not necessarily mean that we didn’t already have techniques in location to detect fraud and terrible wallet addresses and theft, points like that.”

The company was currently operating with external consultants to recognize and block transactions from suspicious wallets, McGregor mentioned. Then ShapeShift underwent a compliance overhaul all through the next half of 2018, mandating KYC identification checks for all buyers and working with 3 independent analytics companies, Chainalysis, ComplyAdvantage and IDology.

McGregor mentioned ShapeShift continues to “tweak” its strategies, both in-property and by do the job with the 3 aforementioned companies vendors, in buy to retain up with the evolving engineering.

Richard Sanders, CSO and co-founder of CipherBlade, explained to CoinDesk he believes the claims in the WSJ report were being “grossly exaggerated.”

“We did uncover close to $3 million, which isn’t a terrific glance for ShapeShift,” Sanders explained. “But it is appreciably lesser than what the Wall Avenue Journal claimed.” CipherBlade suggests its impartial assessment was not paid for by ShapeShift.

For his part, ShapeShift’s Voorhees continues request the WSJ retract the report, which was published in September 2018 for the duration of the company’s compliance overhaul. He believes the methodology used to tally questionable resources was basically flawed.

“Crypto is bringing light-weight, fact, and openness to finance,” Voorhees informed CoinDesk. “And it’s a nice irony that the…